
Loading…

Loading…
Opinion
101 S. Ct. 81 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 6, 1980
Ninth Circuit · Jan 23, 1997
Eleventh Circuit · Apr 6, 1995
W.D. North Carolina · Oct 3, 1994
Ninth Circuit · Sep 3, 1993
Eleventh Circuit · Aug 10, 1993
D. South Dakota · Mar 26, 1993
D. Minnesota · Mar 12, 1993
Fifth Circuit · Dec 3, 1992
Virgin Islands · Jul 28, 1992
Parentheticals
concluding that a plan to launder ill-gotten proceeds was one facet of a cocaine distribution scheme
no EIS required where ministerial granting of mineral patent was not major federal action and did not enable recipient to affect environment
since Department of the Interior had no discretion to consider environmental factors in issuing a mineral patent, it was a ministerial act and not subject to NEPA
Sugarloaf Citizens Ass'n. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
“the actions taken by the Secretary of the Interior in processing an application for patent by such claimant are not discretionary; issuance of a patent can be compelled by court order”
"By failing to make a timely motion for the production of the Jencks Act materials as the statute requires, appellants waived any right they may have had to complain on appeal of an alleged lack of governmental production."
“By failing to make a timely motion for the production of the Jencks Act materials as the statute requires, appellants waived any right they may have had to complain on appeal of an alleged lack of governmental production.”
a deadly serious offer to pay a reward to anyone who "kills, maims, or seriously injures a member of the American Nazi Party" at the time of the Nazi march in Skokie five weeks away constitutes solicitation
non-discretionary acts not subject to NEPA
non-discretionary acts not subject to NEPA