Full text
Energy Consumers & Producers Assn., Inc. v. Department of Energy

Loading…
Opinion
66 L. Ed. 2d 38 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 6, 1980
Full text
Energy Consumers & Producers Assn., Inc. v. Department of Energy
E.D. Virginia · Oct 11, 1994
S.D. Georgia · Mar 22, 1994
Fifth Circuit · Jan 12, 1994
N.D. Georgia · Sep 24, 1993
D. New Hampshire · Feb 4, 1993
Parentheticals
imposing Rule 37 sanctions for failure to obey court order to answer interrogatories truthfully
the court found an implicit condition in any order to answer interrogatories is that the answer be true, responsive and complete
conclusory allegations by agency of impairment to obtain similar information in future — not “plausibly supported in some detail” — are insufficient
agency determination of which oil wells are exempted from reach of relevant statute and regulations is an “in terpretative” rule
Allied Van Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America
Ohio v. Arthur Andersen noted as being contrary to court's decision
Ohio v. Arthur Andersen noted as being contrary to court’s decision
sanctioned party requested appellate court to vacate district court's sanction order for lying in interrogatory answers, and court of appeals refused where determining truth or falsity of answers would require it to evaluate the merits of the underlying action
sanctioned party requested appellate court to vacate district court’s sanction order for lying in interrogatory answers, and court of appeals refused where determining truth or falsity of answers would require it to evaluate the merits of the underlying action