Opinion

Bullwinkle v. California

66 L. Ed. 2d 285 · Supreme Court of the United States · Nov 17, 1980

Full text

Bullwinkle v. California and Bullwinkle v. California

Appeals from Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist., dismissed for want of substantial federal question. Reported below: 105 Cal. App. 3d 82, 164 Cal. Rptr. 163.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 9029664

Citations

66 L. Ed. 2d 285
101 S. Ct. 522
449 U.S. 988
49 U.S.L.W. 3371
1980 U.S. LEXIS 3953

Cited by

Smith v. Cutter Biological, Inc.
Hawaii Supreme Court · Nov 29, 1991
State v. Biegenwald
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 5, 1987
Thomas v. Kemp, Warden
Supreme Court · Dec 1, 1986
Donald Wayne Thomas, Cross-Appellant v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Cross-Appellee
Eleventh Circuit · Jul 28, 1986
Association Of Community Organizations For Reform Now v. Municipality Of Golden
Tenth Circuit · Sep 24, 1984
State v. Christianson
Supreme Court of Iowa · Aug 17, 1983
Dunham v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 29, 1982
Hardy v. Georgia