Loading…

Castro v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Castro v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad

69 L. Ed. 2d 956 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 15, 1981

Full text

Castro v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co.

Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 9033216

Citations

69 L. Ed. 2d 956
452 U.S. 941
101 S. Ct. 3086
49 U.S.L.W. 3931
1981 U.S. LEXIS 2654

Cited by

Aurora World, Inc. v. Ty Inc.
C.D. California · Dec 15, 2009
Computer Access Technology Corp. v. Catalyst Enterprises, Inc.
N.D. California · Feb 13, 2003
Adidas-Salomon AG v. Target Corp.
D. Oregon · Oct 30, 2002
Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Netscape Communications Corp.
C.D. California · Jun 24, 1999
Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. General Circuit Breaker & Electric Supply Inc. Ac Circuit Breaker-Electric Supply, Inc. General Circuit Breaker & Electric Supply Inc. Xavier Contreras Pencon International, Inc. General Magnetics/electric Wholesale the Estate of Charley Contreras Panelboard Specialties Wholesale Electric, Inc. Jaime A. Contreras, Joe A. Contreras, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee. In Re Circuit Breaker Litigation Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Ac Circuit Breaker-Electric Supply, Inc. Joe A. Contreras General Circuit Breaker & Electric Supply Inc. Xavier Contreras Pencon International, Inc. The Estate of Charley Contreras Panelboard Specialties Wholesale Electric, Inc. General Magnetics/electric Wholesale Jaime A. Contreras, Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. General Circuit Breaker & Electric Supply Inc. Joe A. Contreras Ac Circuit Breaker-Electric Supply, Inc. General Circuit Breaker & Electric Supply Inc. Xavier Contreras Pencon International, Inc. General Magnetics/electric Wholesale the Estate of Charley Contreras, Defendants-Counter-Claimants, and Panelboard Specialties Wholesale Electric, Inc. Jaime A. Contreras, Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellants. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. General Circuit Breaker & Electric Supply Inc. Joe A. Contreras Ac Circuit Breaker-Electric Supply, Inc. General Circuit Breaker-Electric Supply Inc. Xavier Contreras Panelboard Specialties Wholesale Electric, Inc. Jaime A. Contreras, Defendants-Counter-Claimants, and Pencon International, Inc. General Magnetics/electric Wholesale the Estate of Charley Contreras, Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellants. In Re Circuit Breaker Litigation Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. General Circuit Breaker & Electric Supply Co. Xavier Contreras Ac Circuit Breaker-Electric Supply, Inc. Joe A. Contreras Pencon International, Inc. The Estate of Charley Contreras General Magnetics/electric Wholesale Panelboard Specialties Wholesale Electric, Inc. Jaime A. Contreras, Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Ninth Circuit · Mar 27, 1997

Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. General Circuit Breaker & Electric Supply Inc.

Ninth Circuit · Feb 10, 1997

Brown v. Adidas Int.

S.D. California · Apr 15, 1996

Foxworthy v. Custom Tees, Inc.

N.D. Georgia · Mar 6, 1995

Urantia Foundation v. Maaherra

D. Arizona · Feb 27, 1995

In Re Circuit Breaker Litigation

C.D. California · May 17, 1994

Winterland Concessions Co. v. Fenton

N.D. California · Oct 20, 1993

Morton v. Rank America, Inc.

C.D. California · Jan 28, 1993

Parentheticals

“to protect consumers against deceptive designations of the origin of goods and, conversely, to enable producers to differentiate their products from those of others”
Cable Electric Products, Inc. v. Genmark, Inc., A/K/A Diablo Products Corp.
a feature of an item may “serve simultaneously as a functional component of a product and a trademark”
Foxworthy v. Custom Tees, Inc.
the source of the right sued upon, not the ground on which the federal jurisdiction is invoked, determines whether federal or state law applies
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Elmas Trading Corp.
ornamental features may fill a consumer need without serving as a trademark even though such features may be nonutilitarian
Unital, Ltd. v. Sleepco Mfg., Ltd.
defendant permitted to manufacture jewelry bearing plaintiffs mark
Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Netscape Communications Corp.