Loading…

Whittaker v. Whittaker Corp. — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Whittaker v. Whittaker Corp.

70 L. Ed. 2d 473 · Supreme Court of the United States · Nov 9, 1981

Full text

Whittaker v. Whittaker Corp.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 9035751

Citations

70 L. Ed. 2d 473
454 U.S. 1031
102 S. Ct. 566
50 U.S.L.W. 3375
1981 U.S. LEXIS 4390

Cited by

Dean v. SCH. DIST. OF CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, NY
W.D. New York · May 7, 2009
Chavez Ex Rel. Chavez v. Board of Education
D. New Mexico · Feb 21, 2009
Wilson v. Preston
Supreme Court of South Carolina · Jun 2, 2008
Dreiling Ex Rel. Infospace, Inc. v. Jain
W.D. Washington · Aug 22, 2003
Dreiling Ex Rel. Infospace, Inc. v. Kellett
W.D. Washington · Jul 9, 2003
Weast v. Schaffer
D. Maryland · Nov 25, 2002
Donoghue v. Natural Microsystems Corp.
S.D. New York · Apr 16, 2002
Brian S. v. Vance
D. Maryland · Mar 15, 2000
John Doe v. Board Of Education Of Oak Park & River Forest High School District 200

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Seventh Circuit · Jun 23, 1997

Doe v. Board of Education

Seventh Circuit · May 27, 1997

Magyar Ex Rel. Magyar v. Tucson Unified School District

D. Arizona · Mar 14, 1997

Virginia Department of Education v. Riley

Fourth Circuit · Feb 5, 1997

Parentheticals

motion to retax costs characterized as Rule 59(e) motion to allow for timely filing of notice of appeal
Ricardo J. Bordallo, Governor of Guam v. Tony Reyes, Taro Kanai, Roberto Olaya, and Carl Peterson
motion labeled Rule 54(d) motion construed as Rule 59(e) motion
James F. Taylor v. MacE Knapp
both the EAHCA and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 applied.
Raul Espino, Jr., Etc. v. Raul Besteiro
motion to retax costs construed as timely Rule 59(e) motion
Ricardo J. Bordallo, Governor of Guam v. Tony Reyes, Taro Kanai, Roberto Olaya, and Carl Peterson