Full text
Penn v. Pennsylvania
Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.
Loading…
Loading…
Opinion
72 L. Ed. 2d 857 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 17, 1982
Full text
Penn v. Pennsylvania
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 14, 1983
Parentheticals
holding that child’s statement was admissible under excited utterance exception even though statement was not made immediately after incident and was the product of questioning
no unnecessary delay under Futch, supra, where two hours of administrative processing were caused in part by defendant's misleading police as to his identity
no unnecessary delay under Futch, supra, where two hours of administrative processing were caused in part by defendant’s misleading police as to his identity