Loading…

Paul v. United States — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Paul v. United States

77 L. Ed. 2d 297 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 16, 1983

Full text

Paul v. United States

Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 9045239

Citations

77 L. Ed. 2d 297
461 U.S. 927
103 S. Ct. 2086
51 U.S.L.W. 3825
1983 U.S. LEXIS 4581

Cited by

Zaid v. United States
Federal Claims · Jan 22, 2009
Lerner v. Lerner Corp.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · May 1, 2000
Credit Francais International v. Bio-Vita, Ltd.
First Circuit · Feb 29, 1996
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. J. William Oldenburg
Tenth Circuit · Dec 2, 1994
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Oldenburg
Tenth Circuit · Sep 8, 1994
Marshack v. Tapager (In Re Motivation Resources, Inc.)
C.D. California · Jul 23, 1993
Donohoe v. Consolidated Operating & Production Corp.
Seventh Circuit · Dec 28, 1992
Georgou v. Fritzshall (In Re Georgou)
N.D. Illinois · Sep 14, 1992
Dunham v. Dunham

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 29, 1992

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Kansas Bankers Surety Company

First Circuit · Apr 27, 1992

United States Department of the Treasury, Office of the Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, National Treasury Employees Union, Intervenor. Department of the Treasury, Office of Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, National Treasury Employees Union, Intervenor

D.C. Circuit · Apr 14, 1992

Carteret Savings Bank, Fa v. Shushan

Third Circuit · Feb 12, 1992

Parentheticals

finding that a reverse stock split is legal under Missouri law
Lerner v. Lerner Corp.
"When the FSLIC is acting in its role as receiver under state law, the applicable substantive law is state rather than federal."
FEDERAL SAV. AND LOAN CORP. v. Capozzi
district court had subject matter jurisdiction over FDIC’s suit under Illinois law where FDIC was suing in its corporate capacity
Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Beall
§ 13 provides incentive to choose partners carefully
Georgou v. Fritzshall (In Re Georgou)