Loading…

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Cunningham v. Golden

80 L. Ed. 2d 810 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 14, 1984

Full text

Cunningham v. Golden

Appeal from Ct. App. Tenn. dismissed for want of substantial federal question. Justice White and Justice Blackmun would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Jurisdiction, Set, White, Would
Cluster ID: 9047728

Citations

80 L. Ed. 2d 810
466 U.S. 966
104 S. Ct. 2336
52 U.S.L.W. 3827
1984 U.S. LEXIS 2099

Cited by

Evans v. Steelman
Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1998
Michael Scott Evans v. Karen Marie Bisson Steeman - Dissenting
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 2, 1996

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Cunningham v. Golden — freecase.ai