Loading…
Opinion
82 L. Ed. 2d 863 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 25, 1984
Full text
Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc. Strickland, Superintendent, Florida State Prison v. Washington Escondido Mutual Water Co. v. La Jolla Band of Mission Indians Weiss v. Employer-Sheet Metal Workers Local 544 Pension Trust Plan
Court of Appeals of Kansas · Jan 20, 2023
Court of Appeals of Kansas · Dec 2, 2022
Court of Appeals of Kansas · Oct 21, 2022
Court of Appeals of Kansas · Oct 21, 2022
Court of Appeals of Kansas · Aug 26, 2022
Parentheticals
concluding that capital sentencing proceedings under Florida law were indistinguishable from ordinary trial for purposes of right to counsel, because they were “sufficiently like a trial in [their] adversarial format and in the existence of standards for decision”
When criminal defendant complains of ineffectiveness of counsel’s assistance, the proper measure of attorney performance remains simply reasonableness under prevailing professional norms.
right to effective assistance violated when government “interferes in certain ways with the ability of counsel to make independent decisions about how to conduct the defense”
right to counsel also guaranteed by Wyo. Const. art. 1, § 10
when needs of grand jury conflict
when needs of grand jury conflict
