Loading…

Riggs v. Kentucky — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Riggs v. Kentucky

83 L. Ed. 2d 118 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 1, 1984

Full text

Riggs v. Kentucky

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 9050403

Citations

83 L. Ed. 2d 118
469 U.S. 857
105 S. Ct. 184
53 U.S.L.W. 3239
1984 U.S. LEXIS 3598

Cited by

Shears v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia · Nov 5, 1996
Georgetown Manor, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, George Levin, Plaintiff-Third Party Plaintiff-Third Party-Defendant, Classic Motor Carriages, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Thomasville Showcase Interiors, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Furniture Industries of Florida, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Joe Krau, Counterclaim-Defendant v. Ethan Allen, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-Counterclaim-Plaintiff-Third Party-Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, Nathan Ancell, Defendant-Counterclaim-Plaintiff-Third Party-Plaintiff. Georgetown Manor, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, George Levin, Plaintiff-Third Party-Defendant v. Ethan Allen, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-Counterclaim-Plaintiff-Third Party-Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, Nathan Ancell, Defendant-Counterclaim-Plaintiff-Third Party-Plaintiff, Joe Krau, Counterclaim-Defendant, Classic Motor Carriages, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Thomasville Showcase Interiors, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Furniture Industries of Florida, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Third Party-Defendants
Third Circuit · May 28, 1993
Georgetown Manor, Inc. v. Ethan Allen, Inc.
Eleventh Circuit · May 28, 1993

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Mizenko v. Electric Motor & Contracting Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia · Jun 5, 1992

Julie Traywick v. Veikko Juhola, United States of America

Eleventh Circuit · Jan 30, 1991

Department of the Army v. Federal Labor Relations Authority

Ninth Circuit · Sep 18, 1990

Allen v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 1990

United States v. Jose Rodriquez-Cardenas, Amado Jesus Perez

Eleventh Circuit · Feb 21, 1989

State v. Hefner

West Virginia Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1988

Johnson v. Eli Lilly and Co.

W.D. New York · Jul 27, 1988

United States v. William Robert Bryan, and Donald Evans Gilbreth, United States of America v. David Leon Snoddy, United States of America v. Ronald Ferguson, and David Pelchat

Eleventh Circuit · May 3, 1988

United States v. Bryan

Eleventh Circuit · May 3, 1988

Parentheticals

value of statement offered for nonhearsay purpose is that it was said and a defendant only needs to cross-examine the person who heard it
Allen v. United States