Fitzpatrick v. Villanova University

Parentheticals

• noting that because plaintiff was a California resident, California courts would be more accessible to him

  Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of the Western National Bank of Lovell, Wyoming v. British-American Insurance Company, Ltd.

• holding that a “but for” damage model is “fatally deficient” where it provides “no basis for the Court to determine without speculation the amount of damage, if any, caused by any of the particular actions of the defendants”

  Rossi v. Standard Roofing, Inc.

• rejecting use of fully distributed cost in favor of average incremental cost

  Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.

• jurisdiction proper in California over Arizona doctor who practiced near California border and advertised in California

  Hill Ex Rel. Hill v. United States

• “A predominant market share may merely be the result of regulation____”

  Metro Mobile CTS, Inc. v. Newvector Communications, Inc.