Full text
Coker v. Williams, Warden
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Loading…
Loading…
Opinion
84 L. Ed. 2d 786 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 4, 1985
Full text
Coker v. Williams, Warden
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 1996
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 17, 1996
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 30, 1996
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 20, 1996
Parentheticals
incorporating Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(2)(E) into the District for Columbia's common law evidentiary rules
incorporat ing Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(2)(E) into the District of Columbia’s common law evidentiary rules
"[w]e hereby adopt Fed. R.Evid. 801(d)(2)(E) as controlling"; "[W]e also conclude, consonant with the approach of all the federal circuits, that under Fed.R.Evid. 104(a), the judge should determine the ultimate admissibility of coconspirators' statements"
"[w]e hereby adopt Fed. R.Evid. 801(d)(2)(E) as controlling”; “[W]e also conclude, consonant with the approach of all the federal circuits, that under Fed.R.Evid. 104(a), the judge should determine the ultimate admissibility of coconspirators' statements”