Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.

Parentheticals

• holding that to prove a Rule of Reason violation under section 1 of the Sherman Act, a plaintiff must allege an anticompetitive effect

  Randolph Mahone v. Addicks Utility District of Harris County

• reversing award of damages where defendant’s proposed jury instruction failed to accurately state controlling legal principle and defendant failed to raise issue about the correct legal principle on appeal

  United States v. Nabila Mahbub

• "Although juries are ... accorded great discretion in determining the amount of damage awards, damages must be proved; they must not be speculative.”

  Betty ROUSH, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KFC NATIONAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant

• "Thus, the plaintiff must allege, not only an injury to himself, but an injury to the market as well."

  Judith Nelson and Darci Anne Bowman, Cross-Appellees v. Monroe Regional Medical Center, Formerly Known as the Monroe Clinic, Cross-Appellant

• “Thus, the plaintiff must allege, not only an injury to himself, but an injury to the market as well.”

  Judith Nelson and Darci Anne Bowman, Cross-Appellees v. Monroe Regional Medical Center, Formerly Known as the Monroe Clinic, Cross-Appellant

• “[i]t is axiomatic that the complaint may not be amended by the briefs in opposition to a motion to dismiss”

  Greenberg Ex Rel. Greenberg v. Boettcher & Co.

• complaint may not be amended by the opposition briefs; on a motion to dismiss, consideration is limited to the pleadings

  McGrath v. MacDonald

• it is “axiomatic that the complaint may not be amended by the briefs in opposition to a motion to dismiss.”

  Weinstein v. United States Air Force

• complaint may not be amended by briefs in opposition to a motion to dismiss

  Sears, Roebuck and Co., Inc. v. Boyd

• reversed and remanded for new trial because punitive damages of $500,-000.00 excessive

  Vance v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.

• relevant market is market for "haulaway services in Chicago area"

  Marvin L. Fishman and Illinois Basketball, Inc. v. Estate of Arthur M. Wirtz, and Illinois Basketball, Inc. v. Estate of Arthur M. Wirtz

• relevant market is market for “haulaway services in Chicago area”

  Marvin L. Fishman and Illinois Basketball, Inc. v. Estate of Arthur M. Wirtz, and Illinois Basketball, Inc. v. Estate of Arthur M. Wirtz