Loading…

Rodman v. Continental Insurance — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Rodman v. Continental Insurance

88 L. Ed. 2d 31 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 7, 1985

Full text

Rodman v. Continental Insurance Cos.

Appeal from C. A. 9th Cir. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 9055426

Citations

88 L. Ed. 2d 31
474 U.S. 804
106 S. Ct. 37
54 U.S.L.W. 3221
1985 U.S. LEXIS 3106

Cited by

Little v. McAninch
Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston) · Dec 29, 1994
Voros v. Turnage
Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston) · May 6, 1993
MacKintosh v. State
Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston) · Dec 10, 1992
Flores v. Arrieta
Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio) · May 9, 1990
State Bar of Texas v. Grossenbacher
Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio) · Dec 27, 1989
McEntire v. McEntire
Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio) · Feb 26, 1986

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service