Loading…
Opinion
88 L. Ed. 2d 324 · Supreme Court of the United States · Nov 4, 1985
Full text
Edmonds v. Virginia Martinez-Villareal v. Arizona Booker v. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections Kennedy v. Alabama
Opinions in this case
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Oct 4, 2013
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Nov 2, 2012
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Nov 5, 2010
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Oct 1, 2010
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Oct 1, 2010
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Sep 17, 2010
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Oct 2, 2009
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Mar 20, 2009
Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 3, 2008
Parentheticals
dealing with qualifications to testify on future dangerousness in a capital case
pecuniary gain factor upheld where defendant was at murder scene to rob victims and took a pickup truck
where the evidence of the burglary was entwined with the homicides the offenses were properly consolidated
no mitigating circumstances found; death penalty affirmed upon findings that killings were done for pecuniary gain and in a depraved manner
"While this failure to object does not preclude review in a capital case, it does weigh against any claim of prejudice. "
capital murder in the commission of robbery, both future dangerousness and vileness found
Florida’s rule against collateral review of matters which should have been raised on direct appeal is an adequate ground under state law to bar federal habeas corpus review
prior cases for a discussion of "particularized intent to kill".
nighttime burglary/intentional killing under § 13A-5-31[a][4]
