Loading…

Gallentine v. United States — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Gallentine v. United States

88 L. Ed. 2d 926 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jan 27, 1986

Full text

Gallentine v. United States

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 9058321

Citations

88 L. Ed. 2d 926
474 U.S. 1105
106 S. Ct. 892
54 U.S.L.W. 3499
1986 U.S. LEXIS 1261

Cited by

Yuma Petroleum Co. v. Thompson
Supreme Court of Louisiana · Mar 2, 1999
Murphy Exploration & Production Company v. Oryx Energy Company
Federal Circuit · Nov 22, 1996
In Re Department of Energy Stripper Well Exemption Litigation. Murfin
Federal Circuit · Oct 10, 1996
Murfin v. United States Department of Energy
Federal Circuit · Jul 18, 1996
Crude Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
District of Columbia · Apr 10, 1996
National Mining Association v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
D.C. Circuit · Sep 21, 1995
Murfin v. United States Department of Energy
D. Kansas · Mar 27, 1995
Texas American Oil Corporation v. United States Department of Energy
Federal Circuit · Jan 6, 1995

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Van Vranken v. Atlantic Richfield Co.

Federal Circuit · Oct 6, 1994

Texas American Oil Corporation v. United States Department of Energy

Federal Circuit · May 10, 1994

Harris v. Maryland National Bank (In Re Harris)

District of Columbia · Mar 21, 1994

K-Com Micrographics, Inc. v. Neighborhood Economic Development Corp. (In Re K-Com Micrographics, Inc.)

District of Columbia · Oct 8, 1993

Parentheticals

requiring DOE to proceed against over 200 working interest owners and over 2200 royalty interest owners would plunge DOE into an "administrative quagmire"
In Re Dept. of Energy Stripper Well Exemption Lit.
requiring DOE to proceed against over 200 working interest owners and over 2200 royalty interest owners would plunge DOE into an "administrative quagmire"
In Re Dept. of Energy Stripper Well Exemption Lit.
requiring DOE to proceed against over 200 working interest owners and over 2200 royalty interest owners would plunge DOE into an “administrative quagmire”
Mobil Oil Corp. v. United States Department of Energy
requiring DOE to proceed against over 200 working interest owners and over 2200 royalty interest owners would plunge DOE into an “administrative quagmire”
Mobil Oil Corp. v. United States Department of Energy
a case decided while Stripper Well, M.D.L. 378, was pending in which Exxon was found to be liable, in restitution, for overcharge violations exceeding $895 million. Kalodner argued unsuccessfully that this money should not be disbursed entirely to the States
In re the Department of Energy Stripper Well Exemption Litigation