
Loading…

Loading…
Opinion
487 U.S. 1211 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 20, 1988
Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo) · Sep 17, 2013
Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth) · Feb 21, 2013
Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth) · Aug 2, 2012
Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso) · Aug 26, 2011
Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth) · Aug 18, 2011
Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco) · Nov 25, 2009
Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo) · Sep 28, 2007
Parentheticals
holding that arrest of suspect was supported by eyewitness identification of suspect by assailant at scene of crime
applying Strickland and holding trial counsel’s concession of defendant’s guilt of murder, but not capital murder, during closing arguments in face of overwhelming proof was tactical decision
other crime directly preceded and led to the crime charged, therefore evidence of the other crime was interrelated and inseparable from the charged crime; exceptions listed in M.R.E. 404(b) not exclusive
other crimes evidence admissible when necessary to tell a rational and coherent story
indictment alleged use of a gun; held to be sufficient without further proof of what type of gun had been used
veniremember "wore a hat in the courtroom . . . and his general demeanor suggested to the prosecutor that he was unstable, unconcerned, and had no respect for the proceedings"
“The fact that a witness cannot 9 give a positive identification of another person goes to the weight of his testimony, not to its admissibility; therefore, the lack of positive identification is a jury issue.”
motion to substitute made 5 days before trial