Loading…

Dopico-Fernandez v. Grand Union Supermarket — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Dopico-Fernandez v. Grand Union Supermarket

102 L. Ed. 2d 135 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 3, 1988

Full text

Dopico-Fernandez v. Grand Union Supermarket

Opinions in this case

Majority
Majority

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 9080987

Citations

102 L. Ed. 2d 135
488 U.S. 864
109 S. Ct. 164
57 U.S.L.W. 3234
1988 U.S. LEXIS 4263

Cited by

Holmes v. Kimco Realty Corp.
Third Circuit · Mar 17, 2010
Ray v. Blockbuster, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · Nov 4, 2008
Rigual-Quintana v. United Parcel Service, Co.
D. Puerto Rico · Mar 6, 2002
Ahern v. Scholz
First Circuit · Jun 4, 1996
Harris v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 28, 1996

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Dopp v. HTP Corp.

D. Puerto Rico · Sep 9, 1993

Doe v. Cloverleaf Mall

S.D. Mississippi · Jun 8, 1993

Hammond-Warner v. United States

E.D. New York · Aug 20, 1992

Scott v. Roberts

D. Kansas · Nov 13, 1991

J. Conrad MacQuarrie v. Howard Johnson Company

First Circuit · Jun 2, 1989

Parentheticals

reservation unto tenant of right to perform landlord’s obligations upon landlord’s failure to do so could not be read to impose any obligation on tenant
Doe v. Cloverleaf Mall
reservation unto tenant of right to perform landlord’s obligations upon landlord’s failure to do so could not be read to impose any obligation on tenant
Ray v. Blockbuster, Inc.
“[t]he term ‘appurtenant’ in a lease is defined to included ‘everything which is necessary and essential to the beneficial use and enjoyment of the thing leased or granted’ ” (citations omitted)
Hammond-Warner v. United States