Loading…
Opinion
102 L. Ed. 2d 166 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 3, 1988
Full text
Vallier v. United States District Court for the Central District of California (Southern Pacific Transportation Co., Real Party in Interest)
Opinions in this case
Sixth Circuit · Mar 2, 2012
Sixth Circuit · Apr 28, 2011
Sixth Circuit · Nov 18, 2010
Fifth Circuit · Oct 4, 2010
W.D. New York · Jun 8, 2010
Sixth Circuit · Apr 20, 2010
Court of Appeals of Kansas · Oct 26, 2007
Sixth Circuit · Aug 31, 2007
Parentheticals
noting that in Keogh, the Supreme Court stated that the main purpose of the Interstate Commerce Act was the prevention of unjust discrimination, and that this required that ICC-approved rates be the sole source of a shipper’s rights against a carrier
applying filed tariff doctrine to insulate defendant from antitrust liability and rejecting competitor exception
“[Participation in the FRP is a privilege, not a right .... ” (internal citations omitted)
when resolution of issue not presented below will "materially advance the progress of [the] already protracted litigation, [courts of appeal] should address it" if the issue has been "presented with sufficient clarity and completeness"
Granville Amos v. Maryland Department Of Public Safety And Correctional Services
when resolution of issue not presented below will “materially advance the progress of [the] already protracted litigation, [courts of appeal] should address it” if the issue has been "presented with sufficient clarity and completeness”
Granville Amos v. Maryland Department Of Public Safety And Correctional Services
inmate with AIDS denied conjugal visit with his wife
