Loading…

Fortney v. United States — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Fortney v. United States

488 U.S. 882 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 11, 1988

Full text

Fortney v. United States

Opinions in this case

Majority
Majority
Dissent — Scalia
Dissent — Scalia

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Berkovitz v. United States, 486 U. S. 531 (1988).

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Connor, Kennedy, Scalia
Cluster ID: 9081197

Citations

488 U.S. 882
109 S. Ct. 210

Cited by

Mark Lynn Fortney Esley Douglas Tipton Mary E. Tipton Daniel Webster Harmon Mary Jane Harmon v. United States of America, Envirotech Corporation American Air Filter Company, Inc. Anacon Corp. Southeastern Sprinkler Company, Inc. Grinnell Fire Protection Systems Co., Inc. American District Telegraph Co. Milton Roy Company Tate Engineering, Inc. Rexnord, Inc. Drexel Brook Engineering Co. Rubbermaid Commercial Prod., Inc. Unijax, Inc. E.I. Pfaff Co., Inc. Simons Eastern Co. C.P. Roberts Engineering, Inc. Yeargin Construction Co., Inc. Shell Oil Company Devon Chemicals, Inc. Publiker Industries, Inc. Buckeye Cellulose Corp. Sybron Corp. Carter and Crawley, Inc. v. Hercules, Incorporated, Third Party

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Third Circuit · Oct 15, 1990

Fortney v. United States

Fourth Circuit · Aug 30, 1990

Matthews v. United States

D. Kansas · Aug 30, 1989

Fortney v. United States

W.D. Virginia · May 8, 1989

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.