Full text
Ashenbaugh v. Crucible Inc. 1975 Salaried Retirement Plan
Opinions in this case
- Majority
- Majority

Loading…
Opinion
104 L. Ed. 2d 1019 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 12, 1989
Full text
Ashenbaugh v. Crucible Inc. 1975 Salaried Retirement Plan
Opinions in this case
S.D. Texas · Jan 9, 2007
E.D. Arkansas · Mar 30, 2005
E.D. Louisiana · Jan 18, 2005
D. Rhode Island · Oct 17, 2003
D. Idaho · Sep 3, 2003
E.D. California · Jul 28, 2003
E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 20, 2003
Federal Circuit · Nov 20, 2001
Parentheticals
holding that the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) did not constitute an unlawful bill of attainder
stating "the language of CERCLA's new contribution provisions reveals Congress's concern that the relative culpability of each responsible party be considered in determining the proportionate share of costs each must bear"
dismissing equal protection challenge to mandatory retirement for judges in part due to summary action of Supreme Court in Diamond
dismissing equal protection challenge to mandatory retirement for judges in part due to summary action of Supreme Court in Diamond
holding release pre-dating CERCLA bars CERCLA claim
supporting the proposition that unfunded early retirement benefits are not "accrued benefits"
stating “the language of CERCLA’s new contribution provisions reveals Congress’s concern that the relative culpability of each responsible party be considered in determining the proportionate share of costs each must bear”
supporting the proposition that unfunded early retirement benefits are not “accrued benefits”
joint and several liability for cleanup costs imposed upon waste generators whose waste caused pollution at site did not violate due process
traditional common law rules holding two or more persons jointly and severally liable for a single and indivisible harm applicable to federal CERCLA cases
joint and several liability for cleanup costs imposed upon waste generators whose waste caused pollution at site did not violate due process
Blue Diamond Coal Co. v. Secretary of Health & Human Services (In re Blue Diamond Coal Co.)
property owners Hutchinson and Seidenberg held liable under § 107(a)(2) merely by virtue of “ownership of the ... property [and disposal of] hazardous substances ... on the property during their period of ownership”