Loading…

Seven Star, Inc. v. United States — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Seven Star, Inc. v. United States

107 L. Ed. 2d 192 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 10, 1989

Full text

Seven Star, Inc. v. United States

Opinions in this case

Majority
Majority

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 9091435

Citations

107 L. Ed. 2d 192
493 U.S. 893
110 S. Ct. 242
58 U.S.L.W. 3241
1989 U.S. LEXIS 4787

Cited by

STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. BAILEY
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 4, 2023
Commonwealth v. Tremblay
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Oct 3, 2018
Bennett v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court · Jun 12, 2018
Lacey v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP (In re Lacey)
D. Massachusetts · Jul 12, 2012
Akar ex rel. Akar v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

D. Massachusetts · Feb 8, 2012

International Strategies Group, Ltd. v. Greenberg Traurig, LLP

First Circuit · Mar 30, 2007

Riley v. Decoulos (In Re American Bridge Products, Inc.)

D. Massachusetts · Jun 29, 2005

In Re Estate of Drwenski

Wyoming Supreme Court · Jan 28, 2004

Cummings v. HPG International, Inc.

First Circuit · Mar 22, 2001

Clifton v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority

Massachusetts Superior Court · Feb 3, 2000

Hinchey v. Nynex Corp.

First Circuit · May 21, 1998

Sebago, Inc. v. Beazer East, Inc.

D. Massachusetts · Mar 31, 1998

Parentheticals

recognizing, but not resolving, conflict between traditional standard of review for findings based on documentary evidence and rule 52 [a]
Commonwealth v. Tremblay
to recover for negligent misrepresentation, the plaintiff must show that the defendant falsely represented that the plaintiff would be employed and that the plaintiff reasonably relied on the representation
Masso v. United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
applying strict scrutiny and rejecting Anderson test
Fulani v. Krivanek