Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
Loading…
Loading…
Opinion
107 L. Ed. 2d 833 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jan 16, 1990
Supreme Court of Connecticut · Mar 20, 2001
Connecticut Appellate Court · Feb 15, 2000
Tenth Circuit · Mar 10, 1998
D. Kansas · Aug 6, 1997
W.D. Virginia · Feb 28, 1997
Tenth Circuit · Apr 5, 1996
Parentheticals
failed attempt to offset subordinated capital debentures of insolvent bank against recovery sought by FDIC on behalf of insolvent bank
"Appellants have made no effort to provide us with a statement envisioned by Fed.R.App.P. 10(c), and it is the responsibility of counsel ... to insure that a complete record is available for our review”
setoff inappropriate where debentures not mutually extinguishable with notes “because the debentures were specifically made subordinate to the claims of all other depositors and creditors of the bank”
no setoff against claim by FDIC where writing requirement was not met
"A conspiracy to rig bids may be an agreement among competitors about ... who should be the successful bidder ... or who should refrain from bidding ... that affects, limits, or avoids competition among them."