C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Loading…
Loading…
Opinion
112 L. Ed. 2d 146 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 1, 1990
E.D. New York · Jul 7, 1995
D. Puerto Rico · Apr 20, 1995
Second Circuit · Jan 17, 1995
Tenth Circuit · Dec 22, 1993
Tenth Circuit · Jul 6, 1993
Third Circuit · Jan 26, 1993
D. Utah · Aug 27, 1992
Parentheticals
holding that there was no speedy trial violation where, among other things, defense counsel agreed to delays and continuances for purposes of plea negotiations
no speedy trial violation where, among other things, “defense counsel agreed to delays and continuances for purposes of plea negotiations”
provisions of the Speedy Trial Act embody a reasonableness standard for exclusion of time only when Congress explicitly required the period of delay to be reasonable
speedy trial clock begins on day after indictment or arraignment