
Loading…

Loading…
Opinion
112 L. Ed. 2d 332 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 29, 1990
M.D. Florida · Apr 12, 2012
W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 28, 2006
M.D. Tennessee · Nov 8, 2004
N.D. California · Jun 21, 2004
E.D. Missouri · Nov 15, 2003
Federal Circuit · Jul 10, 2003
D. Delaware · Feb 27, 2003
S.D. Florida · Sep 10, 2001
Eleventh Circuit · Aug 16, 2001
Parentheticals
holding that a trademark infringement case is “exceptional” and justifies the award of reasonable a attorney’s fee if defendants infringement was malicious, fraudulent, deliberate, and wilful
reversing jury verdict for the plaintiff for $20 million in compensatory damages and punitive damages of $75 million, and granting judgment n.o.v. to the defendant after concluding that the plaintiff's evidence was inadmissible under Richardson
reversing jury verdict for the plaintiff for $20 million in compen satory damages and punitive damages of $75 million, and granting judgment n.o.v. to the defendant after concluding that the plaintiffs evidence was inadmissible under Richardson
"the evidence upon which plaintiffs propose to rely — statistical evidence of widespread discrimination — is common to the class as a whole”
"[t]he Court concludes that the Deferred Compensation Plan provides retirement income to employees and is an employee pension benefit plan under ERISA"
”[t]he Court concludes that the Deferred Compensation Plan provides retirement income to employees and is an employee pension benefit plan under ERISA”