
Loading…

Loading…
Opinion
112 L. Ed. 2d 521 · Supreme Court of the United States · Nov 26, 1990
D. Oregon · Jan 27, 2010
D. Oregon · Oct 13, 2009
N.D. California · Jan 8, 2007
Sixth Circuit · Dec 15, 2006
Hawaii Supreme Court · Sep 8, 2006
District of Columbia · Feb 27, 2006
District of Columbia · Aug 12, 2005
E.D. Virginia · May 17, 2002
Parentheticals
holding that standing requires organization to allege devotion of resources to activities other than litigation costs
discretion where there were no specific mandatory guidelines for the government's identification of the remains of servicemen
fair housing agency has standing if its time and money were deflected from counseling to legal efforts against discrimination
fair housing agency has standing if its time and money were deflected from counseling to legal efforts against discrimination
discretion where there were no specific mandatory guidelines for the government’s identification of the remains of servicemen
section 113 precluded judicial review of the procedure employed to select a remedial plan
“An organization cannot, of course, manufacture the injury necessaiy to maintain a suit from its expenditure of resources on that very suit. Were the rule otherwise, any litigant could create injury in fact by bringing a case, and Article III would present no real limitation.”