
Loading…

Loading…
Opinion
112 L. Ed. 2d 851 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jan 22, 1991
C.D. California · Aug 12, 1996
W.D. Michigan · Mar 22, 1996
Sixth Circuit · Jan 25, 1996
Fifth Circuit · Mar 30, 1995
E.D. Michigan · Nov 23, 1994
E.D. Washington · Oct 21, 1994
Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 18, 1994
Second Circuit · Dec 3, 1993
Parentheticals
recognizing, but not deciding, that the test which apparently emerges from Broce seems to turn on whether the claim of double jeopardy may be adjudicated on the face of the record, or requires supplemental evidence
applying principle of Broce in a direct constitutional challenge to a guilty plea
declining to find that Corbin overruled the "sword exception" to double jeopardy
first two counts seemingly based on one sale and one attempted sale occurring on two different dates one month apart; third count seemingly based on seizure
other bank employees could have executed same embezzlement scheme as defendant, but defendant’s position of trust which gave her authority to routinely balance her own loan transactions facilitated her embezzle-ments
embezzlement conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 656