
Loading…

Loading…
Opinion
113 L. Ed. 2d 219 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 4, 1991
Ninth Circuit · Feb 14, 1997
Eighth Circuit · Dec 6, 1996
Eleventh Circuit · Aug 14, 1996
Sixth Circuit · Jul 22, 1996
Second Circuit · Dec 27, 1995
Third Circuit · Apr 28, 1995
First Circuit · Dec 27, 1994
Parentheticals
noting that when faced with an ambiguous statute, "a court should refer to the 'indictment or information and jury instructions,' or, in the case of a guilty plea, to the plea agreement or transcript, in order to determine if the conviction was for 'generic' ... burglary"
noting that when faced with an ambiguous statute, "a court should refer to the 'indictment or information and jury instructions,' or, in the case of a guilty plea, to the plea agreement or transcript, in order to determine if the conviction was for 'generic' ... burglary”
district court should refer to the plea agreement or plea transcript to determine if defendant pled guilty to generic burglary
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard BONAT, Defendant-Appellant
district court should refer to plea agreement or plea transcript to determine whether defendant’s pri- or conviction was for generic burglary