
Loading…

Loading…
Opinion
115 L. Ed. 2d 979 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 10, 1991
N.D. Indiana · Jul 23, 2009
Eighth Circuit · Apr 12, 2007
Eighth Circuit · Aug 28, 2006
North Dakota Supreme Court · Feb 23, 2006
C.D. California · Apr 8, 2004
Eighth Circuit · Nov 1, 2002
S.D. Iowa · Oct 17, 2002
Parentheticals
concluding that opposite-sex surveillance of male inmates is constitutionally permissible because minimal intrusions on prisoner’s privacy were outweighed by institutional concerns for safety and equal employment opportunity
property owned and mortgage paid by resident's interstate trucking business, and used to put up truck drivers on layovers and to conduct business on weekends
United States v. Ralph Ramey, United States of America v. James "Bo" Payne
property owned and mortgage paid by resident’s interstate trucking business, and used to put up truck drivers on layovers and to conduct business on weekends
United States v. Ralph Ramey, United States of America v. James "Bo" Payne
a “staffing restriction does not violate Title VII” because “a minimal restriction such as the Unit 5 gender-based staffing restriction does not deprive female employees of any employment opportunities”
Deana Tipler v. Douglas County, Nebraska Robert Houston, Director of Douglas County Corrections
“Under this statute, intent may, and generally must, be proved circumstantially.”
"[T]he same conduct may constitute a substantial step toward the commission of more than one charged crime, as long as that conduct strongly corroborates the actor's criminal purpose underlying each charged crime."