Lambert v. Department of the Army

Parentheticals

• grant of Rule 11 motion not res judicata with respect to state claim of malicious prosecution

  Lightning Lube, Inc. Laser Lube, a New Jersey Corporation v. Witco Corporation Avis Service, Inc. Avis Lube, Inc. Avis Enterprises, Inc., Defendants/third Party v. Ralph Venuto, Individually and D/B/A Laser Lube, Lightning Lube, and Automotive Management Systems Carol Venuto, His Wife, Individually Automotive Management Systems, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation, Third Party Witco Corporation, Lightning Lube, Inc. Laser Lube, a New Jersey Corporation v. Witco Corporation Avis Service, Inc. Avis Lube, Inc. Avis Enterprises, Inc., Defendants/third Party v. Ralph Venuto, Individually and D/B/A Laser Lube, Lightning Lube, and Automotive Management Systems Carol Venuto, His Wife, Individually Automotive Management Systems, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation, Third Party Lightning Lube, Inc., T/a Laser Lube

• grant of Rule 11 motion not res judicata with respect to state claim of malicious prosecution

  Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.

• denial of Rule 11 sanctions has no collateral estoppel effect in subsequent action for conspiracy, malicious prosecution, libel and intentional infliction of emotional distress

  Robinson v. Eng

• denial of Rule 11 sanctions has no collateral estoppel effect in subsequent action for damages based on conspiracy, malicious prosecution, libel, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

  PLUS INTERN., INC. v. Pace

• “Legislators’ immunity is absolute, and extends to injunctive as well as to damages suits.”

  Hall v. Louisiana