Loading…

Feldman v. United States — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Feldman v. United States

502 U.S. 1099 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 24, 1992

Full text

Feldman, aka Fleming, aka Givner v. United States

Opinions in this case

Majority
Majority

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 9117728

Citations

502 U.S. 1099
117 L. Ed. 2d 426

Cited by

Ruppert Ex Rel. Fairmount Park, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan v. Principal Life Insurance
S.D. Iowa · May 27, 2010
Groat v. Carlson (In Re Groat)
Eighth Circuit · May 24, 2007
Craig Edward Groat v. Donald R. Carlson
Eighth Circuit · May 24, 2007
White v. Centex Home Equity Co., L.L.C. (In Re White)
D. Kansas · Feb 9, 2007
Lopez v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Federal Circuit · May 5, 2006
Ramirez v. Household Finance Corp. III (In Re Ramirez)

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

D. Kansas · Sep 9, 2005

Merriman v. Beneficial Mortgage Co. of Kansas (In Re Merriman)

D. Kansas · Sep 7, 2005

Corley v. Rosewood Care Center, Inc. of Peoria

Seventh Circuit · Oct 13, 2004

Stanley v. Household Finance Corp. III (In Re Stanley)

D. Kansas · Oct 8, 2004

Quenzer v. Advanta Mortgage Corp. (In Re Quenzer)

D. Kansas · May 31, 2001

Mehling v. New York Life Insurance

E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 29, 2001

AFS Financial, Inc. v. Burdette

N.D. Illinois · Jul 19, 2000

Parentheticals

contract gave the insurance company the right periodically and unilaterally to change the prospective interest rate
State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Mutual Life Insurance
fraud occurs only when a person of ordinary prudence and comprehension would rely on misrepresentations; no reasonable person would rely on puffery that an investment will earn the "highest" rate of return
Corley v. Rosewood Care Center, Inc. of Peoria
fraud occurs only when a person of ordinary prudence and comprehension would rely on misrepresentations; no reasonable person would rely on puffery that an investment will earn the “highest” rate of return
Corley v. Rosewood Care Center, Inc. of Peoria
contract gave insurer right to alter interest rate to beneficiaries’ disadvantage
A. Ronald Sirna, Jr., P.C. Profit Sharing Plan v. Prudential Securities, Inc.