
Loading…

Loading…
Opinion
118 L. Ed. 2d 207 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 30, 1992
E.D. New York · Mar 11, 1998
S.D. Florida · Aug 1, 1997
Eighth Circuit · Sep 12, 1996
Washington Supreme Court · Aug 29, 1996
W.D. Wisconsin · Jun 11, 1996
Indiana Court of Appeals · May 31, 1996
D. Nevada · Feb 14, 1996
Parentheticals
party whose only evidence of bad faith is pure speculation not entitled to extra-record discovery
epileptic taking anticon-vulsant medicine is not otherwise qualified to drive commercial vehicles even though risk may be small
denial of waiver of safety regulation allegedly in contravention of the Rehabilitation Act did not fall within APA’s discretionary exception to judicial review
DOT was entitled to rely on blanket prohibition in task force report without individual inquiry into particular driver's circumstances
“[i]t is equally clear that the federal government is not obligated to provide particular services or benefits, nor to. undertake any specific fiduciary responsibilities in the absence of a specific provision in a treaty, agreement, executive order, or statute”