Kinney v. Indiana Youth Center

Parentheticals

• "over-reaching, harassing, intentional and bad faith conduct" does not implicate double jeopardy unless "the prosecutor's conduct was `intended to provoke the defendant into moving for a mistrial.' [ Oregon v.] Kennedy, 456 U.S. at 679, 102 S.Ct. at 2091[, 72 L.Ed.2d at 427]"

  Tomlin v. State

• `over-reaching, harassing, intentional and bad faith conduct' does not implicate double jeopardy unless `the prosecutor's conduct was "intended to provoke the defendant into moving for a mistrial." [ Oregon v.] Kennedy, 456 U.S. at 679, 102 S.Ct. at 2091[, 72 L.Ed.2d at 427]'

  Tomlin v. State

• Court has extended Ake to include experts necessary for an adequate defense upon proper showing

  Rogers v. State

• no discussion of Ake, defendant did not show necessity or inability to pay

  Rogers v. State