Loading…

Attorney General of California v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Attorney General of California v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

119 L. Ed. 2d 578 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 8, 1992

Full text

Attorney General of California v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

Opinions in this case

Majority
Majority

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Justice Blackmun would grant certiorari. ■ Justice Souter took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Certiorari, Consideration, Took
Cluster ID: 9122245

Citations

119 L. Ed. 2d 578
504 U.S. 979
112 S. Ct. 2956
60 U.S.L.W. 3828
1992 U.S. LEXIS 3504

Cited by

Rogers v. City of Richmond
E.D. Virginia · Mar 23, 2012
Dept. of Labor & Indus. v. Lanier Brugh
Court of Appeals of Washington · Aug 21, 2006
Gruver v. Lesman Fisheries, Inc.
W.D. Washington · May 16, 2005
McMichael v. Falls City Towing Co.
W.D. Kentucky · May 2, 2002

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

King Jewelry, Inc. v. Federal Express Corp.

C.D. California · Sep 13, 2001

Cash America Pawn, L.P. v. Federal Express Corp.

N.D. Texas · May 5, 2000

Tax Appeal of Kamikawa v. Lynden Air Freight, Inc.

Hawaii Supreme Court · Nov 25, 1998

Kamikawa v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Hawaii Supreme Court · Oct 29, 1998

Keeley v. Loomis Fargo & Co.

D. New Jersey · Jun 12, 1998

Zelaya v. J.M. MacIas, Inc.

E.D. North Carolina · Feb 13, 1998

Tampa Port Authority v. M/V DUCHESS

M.D. Florida · Jun 6, 1997

Slaven v. BP America, Inc.

C.D. California · Mar 21, 1997

Parentheticals

holding that 49 U.S.C. § 1305 — a broader preemption statute with very different language — preempted state regulation of Federal Express, including its trucking services
Tax Appeal of Kamikawa v. Lynden Air Freight, Inc.
FLSA does not broadly preempt state wage laws that are more protective than the FLSA
Bureerong v. Uvawas
“California’s more protective overtime provisions are compatible with, rather than conflict with, the [FLSA].”
Rogers v. City of Richmond
“the general rule on preemption in admiralty is that states may supplement federal admiralty law as applied to matters of local concern, so long as state law does not actually conflict with federal law... .”
Tampa Port Authority v. M/V DUCHESS