Full text
Fund for Accurate and Informed Representation, Inc. v. Weprin
Opinions in this case
- Majority
- Majority
Affirmed on appeal from D. C. N. D. N. Y.
Justice Stevens would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.
Loading…
Loading…
Opinion
121 L. Ed. 2d 577 · Supreme Court of the United States · Dec 7, 1992
Full text
Fund for Accurate and Informed Representation, Inc. v. Weprin
Opinions in this case
S.D. New York · Mar 15, 2004
W.D. New York · Oct 6, 2003
E.D. New York · Jul 31, 2003
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 23, 1995
S.D. California · Aug 4, 1995
S.D. New York · Jun 14, 1995
D. Maryland · Jan 14, 1994
W.D. New York · Jun 30, 1993
Parentheticals
holding that cattle theft is not a crime of dishonesty
summarily affirming a District Court's finding that there was no prima facie case where the maximum population deviation was 9.43%
alleged packing of minorities upheld because less than a 65% super- majority “may lead to ineffective minority control districts”
“absent credible evidence that the maximum deviation exceeded 10 percent [it was 9.43%], plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case of discrimination ... sufficient to warrant further analysis by this court.”