Kotrosits v. GATX Corp. Non-Contributory Pension Plan for Salaried Employees

Parentheticals

• stating that cases raised question whether a private suit under RICO may be brought against a utility to recover for excessive charges for electrical power

  Big Rivers Electric Corp. v. Thorpe

• the rationale underlying the filed rate doctrine applies "whether the rate at issue has been set by a state rate-making authority or a federal one”

  Uniforce Temporary Personnel, Inc. v. National Council on Compensation Insurance

• “where such party shows the kind of conflict of interest that could realistically be expected to bias the decision makers, [Firestone] counsels in favor of withholding deference”

  McCall v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

• “anyone urging that a court disregard [a reservation of discretionary authority by the plan] has the burden of showing some reason to believe the exercise of discretion has been tainted”

  Rizzo v. Paul Revere Insurance Group

• “this principle, [which is central to the filed rate doctrine] ..., applies with equal force to preclude recovery under RICO whether the rate at issue has been set by a state rate-making authority or a federal one”

  Destec Energy, Inc. v. Southern California Gas Co.