
Loading…

Loading…
Opinion
507 U.S. 974 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 8, 1993
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 31, 2003
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 23, 2002
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 2000
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 24, 1999
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 26, 1998
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 21, 1998
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 21, 1998
Parentheticals
finding no prejudice in admission of certain evidence from Commonwealth witness in guilt phase via a detective’s testimony that went toward establishing aggravating factor where jury ultimately did not find this aggravating factor
finding no prejudice in admission of certain evidence from Commonwealth witness in guilt phase via a detective's testimony that went toward establishing aggravating factor where jury ultimately did not find this aggravating factor
sexual mutilation supported finding that defendant had killed victim in course of sexually abusing her
reference to defendant’s incarceration did not warrant mistrial where statement was neither elicited nor exploited by Commonwealth and jury was not informed of reason for incarceration
Article I, section 16, standard for determining whether punishment is cruel and unusual is the same as Eighth Amendment standard
applying different method of analysis to Article I, section 16
no abuse of discretion when the record supported the trial court's finding, after the questioning of a juror who had been contacted by the mother of a victim, "that [the] juror * * * was not contaminated by the contact and could still serve as an impartial juror"