Loading…

Clark v. United States — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Clark v. United States

509 U.S. 926 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 28, 1993

Full text

Clark v. United States

Opinions in this case

Majority
Majority

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 9136295

Citations

509 U.S. 926
125 L. Ed. 2d 730

Cited by

Townes v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Dec 18, 2015
Bohannon v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Oct 23, 2015
Carroll v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Aug 14, 2015
Boyle v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Mar 29, 2013
Parr v. Thaler
Fifth Circuit · Apr 30, 2012
Nelson v. Quarterman
Fifth Circuit · Dec 14, 2006

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Martinez v. Dretke

W.D. Texas · Mar 29, 2006

Runnels v. State

Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston) · Mar 9, 2006

Miller v. Dretke

Fifth Circuit · Nov 16, 2005

Draughon v. Dretke

Fifth Circuit · Sep 30, 2005

Banyard v. Duncan

C.D. California · Oct 4, 2004

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Aug 27, 2004

Parentheticals

holding Texas capital sentencing special issues permit jury to give adequate consideration to mitigating aspects of defendant's youth without need for supplemental Penry instruction
Adanandus v. Johnson
addressing merits following objection that testimony of witness who displayed wounds to jury was "inflammatory, prejudicial and introduced evidence of an extraneous charge"
Runnels v. State
addressing merits following objection that testimony of witness who displayed wounds to jury was “inflammatory, prejudicial and introduced evidence of an extraneous charge”
Runnels v. State
proper to excuse juror who would hold government to higher standard than reasonable doubt
United States v. Manuel Flores, United States of America v. Juan Raul Garza