
Loading…

Loading…
Opinion
513 U.S. 966 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 31, 1994
Supreme Court of Delaware · Aug 10, 2001
Connecticut Appellate Court · Mar 20, 2001
District of Columbia · Feb 23, 2001
Court of Appeals of Virginia · Dec 8, 1998
First Circuit · Mar 9, 1998
Ninth Circuit · Oct 9, 1996
Parentheticals
affirming defendant's conviction for murdering his wife, court held statements that defendant believed he and wife were in danger were inadmissible under Rule 803(3) because they were statements of belief as opposed to state of mind
affirming defendant’s conviction for murdering his wife, court held statements that defendant believed he and wife were in danger were inadmissible under Rule 803(3) because they were statements of belief as opposed to state of mind
failure to instruct on statute reviewed as plain error; conviction affirmed where failure was harmless