
Loading…

Loading…
Opinion
130 L. Ed. 2d 664 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jan 9, 1995
N.D. Iowa · Sep 18, 2007
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 26, 2006
N.D. Iowa · May 20, 2005
N.D. Iowa · Sep 15, 2004
Eighth Circuit · Jun 23, 2004
Eighth Circuit · May 4, 2004
Seventh Circuit · Oct 16, 2002
Eighth Circuit · Jan 26, 2001
Eighth Circuit · Jul 7, 2000
Eighth Circuit · Oct 28, 1999
Parentheticals
holding gang membership admissible because “it did not substitute for evidence of actual participation in the drug distribution conspiracy”
allowing evidence of gang membership to clarify connections between defendants in drug distribution conspiracy case
affirming the admission of expert testimony to the effect that a defendant's possession of scales during the purchase of thirty grams of cocaine was consistent with drug trafficking rather than personal consumption
United States v. Walter Garcia, Victor Hugo Alegria, Carlos Camacho and Agustin Vivas-Garcia
affirming the admission of expert testimony to the effect that a defendant’s possession of scales during the purchase of thirty grams of cocaine was consistent with drug trafficking rather than personal consumption
United States v. Walter Garcia, Victor Hugo Alegria, Carlos Camacho and Agustin Vivas-Garcia
gang association admissible to prove conspiracy existed