C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Loading…
Loading…
Opinion
131 L. Ed. 2d 223 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 20, 1995
Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo) · Feb 8, 2006
Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso) · Jul 7, 2005
Fifth Circuit · Jun 2, 2005
Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth) · Jun 2, 2005
Fifth Circuit · May 31, 2005
Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo) · Apr 7, 2005
Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo) · Mar 2, 2005
Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo) · Feb 8, 2005
Parentheticals
holding trial counsel's decision not to request a limiting instruction to avoid reminding jury of incriminating evidence was reasonable trial strategy
holding trial counsel’s decision not to request a limiting instruction to avoid reminding jury of incriminating evidence was reasonable trial strategy
trial counsel's decision not to request a limiting instruction to avoid reminding jury of incriminating evidence was reasonable trial strategy
trial counsel’s decision not to request a limiting instruction to avoid reminding jury of incriminating evidence was reasonable trial strategy
once evidence is received without a proper limiting instruction, it becomes part of the general evidence in the case and may be used as proof to the full extent of its rational persuasive power
complaint regarding competency of translator is distinguishable from complaint regarding accuracy of individual translation
once evidence is received without a proper limiting instruction, it becomes part of the general evidence in the case and may be used as proof to the full extent of its rational persuasive power
failure to explain allegation of prosecutorial misconduct