
Loading…

Loading…
Opinion
131 L. Ed. 2d 850 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 15, 1995
First Circuit · May 8, 2006
Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 10, 2003
Ninth Circuit · Oct 16, 2002
D. Massachusetts · Sep 19, 2000
M.D. Alabama · Aug 16, 2000
N.D. Iowa · Apr 3, 2000
D. Maine · Dec 20, 1999
D. Maine · Oct 27, 1999
Parentheticals
stating that relief will not be granted “to a plaintiff who has been discharged unfairly, even by the most irrational of managers, unless the facts and circumstances indicate that discriminatory animus was the reason for the decision”
Ivan RUIZ, Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. POSADAS DE SAN JUAN ASSOCIATES, Defendant, Appellee
summarizing facts establishing prima facie case in Keisling v. SER-Jobs for Progress, Inc., 19 F.3d 755, 760 (1st Cir.1994)
nonparty admitted he had read injunction at his deposition and therefore had notice of the order
“prejudgment interest, while not specifically mentioned in the Warsaw Convention, is allowable in cargo loss case since it speeds settlement and recovery and fully compensates the successful plaintiff for the time and value of its money that defendant enjoyed from the delay in payment”
New York Marine & General Insurance v. S/S "Ming Prosperity"
Title VII — sex discrimination