Loading…

Amarille v. Office of Personnel Management — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Amarille v. Office of Personnel Management

135 L. Ed. 2d 1057 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 17, 1996

Full text

Amarille v. Office of Personnel Management

Opinions in this case

Majority
Majority

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 9161841

Citations

135 L. Ed. 2d 1057
518 U.S. 1010
116 S. Ct. 2534
64 U.S.L.W. 3837
1996 U.S. LEXIS 3994

Cited by

Robert Murray v. Dora Schriro
Ninth Circuit · Mar 17, 2014
Amarille v. Office of Personnel Management
Federal Circuit · Nov 9, 2001
State v. Thompson
Court of Appeals of Arizona · Oct 25, 2001
State v. Purcell
Court of Appeals of Arizona · Jan 4, 2001
State v. Ramirez
Court of Appeals of Arizona · Feb 6, 1998

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

State v. Spreitz

Arizona Supreme Court · Sep 11, 1997

Arizona Supreme Court · Aug 26, 1997

State v. Hughes

Arizona Supreme Court · May 6, 1997

United States v. Arlo Rodney Eschief

Ninth Circuit · Mar 10, 1997

Arizona Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1996

State v. McCrimmon

Arizona Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1996

State v. Winkle

Arizona Supreme Court · Aug 13, 1996

Parentheticals

"To show premeditation, the state must prove that the defendant acted with either the intent or knowledge that he would kill his victim and that such intent or knowledge preceded the killing by a length of time permitting reflection."
State v. Ramirez
“To show premeditation, the state must prove that the defendant acted with either the intent or knowledge that he would kill his victim and that such intent or knowledge preceded the killing by a length of time permitting reflection.”
State v. Ramirez