Loading…

Tatta v. Miller — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Tatta v. Miller

140 L. Ed. 2d 653 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 6, 1998

Full text

Tatta v. Miller, Superintendent, Eastern Correctional Facility

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 9168902

Citations

140 L. Ed. 2d 653
523 U.S. 1063
118 S. Ct. 1394
66 U.S.L.W. 3654
1998 U.S. LEXIS 2376

Cited by

Dawn Hall Baker v. Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Eighth Circuit · Apr 9, 2003
State v. Littlefair
Court of Appeals of Washington · Aug 2, 2002
Kevin B. Paige v. United States
Eighth Circuit · Mar 3, 1999
Poland v. Stewart
D. Arizona · Mar 2, 1999
Sperling v. White
C.D. California · Dec 11, 1998
98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8959, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,479 Arthur Calderon, Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin v. The United States District Court for the Central District of California, Horace Edwards Kelly, Real Party in Interest
Ninth Circuit · Dec 8, 1998
Calderon v. United States District Court for the Central District of California
Ninth Circuit · Dec 8, 1998

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Parentheticals

by creating a statute of limitations, Congress intended to "halt the unacceptable delay which has developed in the federal habeas process"
Sperling v. White
by creating a statute of limitations, Congress intended to “halt the unacceptable delay which has developed in the federal habeas process”
Sperling v. White