Opinion

Pro-Football, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

140 L. Ed. 2d 673 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 20, 1998

Full text

Pro-Football, Inc., dba The Washington Redskins v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Citations

Cited by

Parentheticals

holding that even where a counterclaim is included as part of a timely-filed answer under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, where state law established limitations period, limitations not tolled as to untimely counterclaim
Fritschle v. Andes
The Act's requirement that an infringing use be in "commerce" encompasses non-profit services.
CHRISTIAN SCI. BD. OF DIRECTORS v. Robinson
The Act’s requirement that an infringing use be in “commerce” encompasses non-profit services.
Christian Science Board of Directors of the First Church of Christ, Scientist v. Robinson