
Loading…

Loading…
Opinion
149 L. Ed. 2d 1027 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 29, 2001
Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 12, 2008
Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo) · Feb 14, 2007
Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo) · Jan 24, 2007
Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 17, 2006
Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 25, 2006
Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 16, 2006
Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston) · Nov 23, 2005
Parentheticals
holding that an appellant must prove there exists a reasonable probability that the outcome would have been different but for counsel’s unprofessional errors
holding that an appellant must prove there exists a reasonable probability that the outcome would have been different but for counsel's unprofessional errors
holding that an appellant must prove there exists a reasonable probability that the outcome would have been different but for counsel’s unprofessional errors
holding that because the record was silent as to why defense counsel failed to object, it was insufficient to overcome the presumption that his actions were part of a strategic plan
holding that because the record was silent as to why defense counsel failed to object, it was insufficient to overcome the presumption that his actions were part of a strategic plan
holding counsel’s failure to object to victim impact testimony and evidence was not ineffective assistance of counsel when the trial record was silent as to counsel’s strategy
holding counsel = s failure to object to victim impact testimony and evidence was not ineffective assistance of counsel when the trial record was silent as to counsel = s strategy