Loading…

Subramanian v. QAD Inc. — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Subramanian v. QAD Inc.

162 L. Ed. 2d 891 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 27, 2005

Full text

Subramanian v. QAD Inc.

Opinions in this case

Majority
Majority

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 9230565

Citations

162 L. Ed. 2d 891
545 U.S. 1141
125 S. Ct. 2982
2005 U.S. LEXIS 5067

Cited by

Com. v. Nedby, K.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 2019
Commonwealth v. Phillips
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 5, 2014
Commonwealth v. Kearney
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 6, 2014
Ex Parte Jose Moreno
Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth) · Aug 30, 2012
Hall v. Quarterman
Fifth Circuit · Jul 9, 2008
Hunter v. State

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 7, 2007

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 26, 2007

United States v. Lou William Vallas

Eleventh Circuit · Feb 23, 2007

United States v. Korak Jerome Manuel

Eleventh Circuit · Nov 29, 2006

Hudson v. State

Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco) · Aug 30, 2006

Hall v. Quarterman

N.D. Texas · Aug 3, 2006

United States v. Reginald Alvin Milian

Eleventh Circuit · Jun 21, 2006

Parentheticals

reiterating deficient oral guilty plea colloquy does not render plea per se invalid; court can consider totality of circumstances surrounding entry of guilty plea to determine defendant's actual knowledge of implications and rights associated with guilty plea
Commonwealth v. Phillips