Loading…

A&F Trademark, Inc. v. Tolson — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

A&F Trademark, Inc. v. Tolson

163 L. Ed. 2d 62 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 3, 2005

Full text

A&F Trademark, Inc. v. Tolson, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Revenue

Ct. App. N. C. Certiorari denied.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 9252954

Citations

163 L. Ed. 2d 62
546 U.S. 821
126 S. Ct. 353
74 U.S.L.W. 3202
2005 U.S. LEXIS 6033

Cited by

Global Hookah Distributors, Inc. v. Dept. of Rev.
Oregon Tax Court · Aug 6, 2021
Lorenzo Lott v. ICS Merrill
Sixth Circuit · Jun 7, 2012
Scioto Insurance Co. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 1, 2012
KFC Corporation Vs. Iowa Department Of Revenue
Supreme Court of Iowa · Dec 30, 2010
Gregory Kelly v. Warren County Board of Comm'rs
Sixth Circuit · Sep 14, 2010
Classics Chicago, Inc. v. Comptroller of Treasury
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jan 4, 2010
Lamtec Corp. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF STATE
Court of Appeals of Washington · Aug 4, 2009
Madden v. Chattanooga City Wide Service Department
Sixth Circuit · Nov 25, 2008

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Gibson v. Shelly Co.

Sixth Circuit · Aug 19, 2008

Jackson v. United Dairy Farmers

S.D. Ohio · May 20, 2008

Hall v. City of Clarksville

Sixth Circuit · May 6, 2008

BRIDGES, SEC. OF DEPT. OF REV. v. Geoffrey

Louisiana Court of Appeal · Feb 8, 2008

Parentheticals

determining that "where a wholly-owned subsidiary licenses trademarks to a related retail company operating stores located within North Carolina, there exists a substantial nexus with the State sufficient to satisfy the Commerce Clause"
Scioto Insurance Co. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission
“The Reeves Court ... require[s] that a plaintiff present both evidence supporting a prima facie case and evidence sufficient to support the factfinder’s disbelief of the defendant’s proffered reason.”
Ferguson v. Snow
similar for North Carolina’s corporate franchise and income taxes
Global Hookah Distributors, Inc. v. Dept. of Rev.