
Loading…

Loading…
Opinion
117 S. Ct. 82 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 7, 1996
Eighth Circuit · Jul 27, 2006
D. Delaware · Feb 25, 2003
S.D. New York · Feb 25, 2002
Third Circuit · Oct 1, 2001
E.D. New York · Nov 5, 1999
Court of International Trade · Oct 14, 1999
S.D. New York · Jul 9, 1999
S.D. New York · Jul 1, 1999
Parentheticals
finding no violation of due process or right to fair trial where the prejudicial effect of the prosecutor’s statement that “buy[ing] [Levine’s] insanity defense” would mean that Levine “walk[s] out of this courtroom a free man,” was minimized by two instructions by the district court
finding no violation of due process or right to fair trial where the prejudicial effect of the prosecutor's statement that "buy[ing] [Levine's] insanity defense" would mean that Levine "walk[s] out of this courtroom a free man," was minimized by two instructions by the district court