Loading…

Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States ex rel. Schumer — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States ex rel. Schumer

519 U.S. 926 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 15, 1996

Full text

Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States ex rel. Schumer

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to Questions 1 and 2 presented by the petition.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 9282811

Citations

519 U.S. 926
117 S. Ct. 293
136 L. Ed. 2d 212
96 Daily Journal DAR 12552
65 U.S.L.W. 3292
1996 U.S. LEXIS 6426
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7642

Cited by

United States Ex Rel. K & R Ltd. v. Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency
District of Columbia · Jul 30, 2001
Bleek v. Supervalu, Inc.
D. Montana · Mar 31, 2000
Beerheide v. Suthers
D. Colorado · Jan 31, 2000
United States Ex Rel. Thompson v. Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp.
S.D. Texas · Aug 18, 1998
Beerheide v. Zavaras
D. Colorado · Mar 16, 1998
Ingalls v. Florio
D. New Jersey · Jun 13, 1997
In Re Silicon Graphics, Inc. Securities Litigation
N.D. California · May 23, 1997
Cleveland County Ass'n for Government by the People v. Cleveland County Board of Commissioners

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

District of Columbia · May 19, 1997

97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2729, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4875 Kenneth O. Ashelman v. Donald B. Wawrzaszek, Ellis C. MacDougall A. Guajalva, and Robert Goldsmith, Kenneth O. Ashelman v. Donald B. Wawrzaszek, Ellis C. MacDougall A. Guajalva, and Robert Goldsmith

Ninth Circuit · Apr 25, 1997

Ashelman v. Wawrzaszek

Ninth Circuit · Apr 15, 1997

Jasniowski v. Rushing

Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 31, 1997

United States of America, Ex Rel. D.J. Findley v. Fpc-Boron Employees' Club

D.C. Circuit · Mar 18, 1997

Parentheticals

rejecting argument that the qui tam provisions are unconstitutional because they violate the doctrine of separation of powers and the Appointment Clause
United States Ex Rel. K & R Ltd. v. Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency
granting certiorari in Flores v. City of Boerne, 73 F.3d 1352 (5th Cir.1996)
Counts v. Newhart